MSU study focuses on controlling volunteer potatoes

In general, 2019 was a difficult year for field crop growers throughout Michigan.

For many potato growers, winter weather set in before all fields could be harvested. Historically, harsh winter temperatures kill tubers that remain in the field after harvest. Although, in regions where winters are mild and soil temperatures are not cold enough to kill tubers left in the field, tubers can survive to overwinter and become a serious weed problem the following spring.

Not only do volunteer potatoes compete with crops and reduce yield, but they also harbor insects, diseases and nematodes that can infest neighboring or future potato crops.

Volunteer potatoes are difficult to control. Currently, there are no herbicides available that will completely control volunteer potatoes and significantly reduce the number of daughter tubers produced per plant.

The Michigan State University potato research team conducted volunteer potato control studies in 2018 and 2019 to investigate potential volunteer control options in corn (Table 1).
 

(Click to enlarge)

Table 1. Postemergence herbicide treatment list for volunteer potato control.

Results in the Images below highlight two important facts. First, the addition of atrazine to herbicide treatments improved control. Second, as the size of volunteer potatoes increased, control decreased. When applications were made to small volunteers (less than 6 inches), 60% of treatments resulted in one or no daughter tubers produced per plant.

When applications were made to medium (6-12 inches) or tall (more than 12 inches), only 25% and 0% of treatments resulted in one or no daughter tubers produced per plant (Fig. 1). A similar trend was observed in the mean daughter tuber weight (Fig. 2).
 

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 1. Mean daughter tubers produced per plant at the Montcalm Research Center location. Mean tubers (plant-1) values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 2. Mean daughter tuber weight at the Montcalm Research Center location. Mean tuber weight values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

In addition to the treatments outlined in Table 1, we also tested glyphosate in both years. In 2018, glyphosate provided little control. In contrast, in 2019 glyphosate was highly effective at controlling volunteers. Given this variability, if glyphosate is applied to control volunteers, scout fields two weeks after application to ensure sufficient control.

Finally, keep in mind your plans for future rotational crops and consult Table 12 – Herbicide Crop Rotation Restrictions in the 2020 MSU Weed Control Guide for rotation restrictions.

The Michigan Potato Industry Commission supported this research. For full study details and additional results, see the 2019 Michigan Potato Research Report.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 3. Volunteer potato control 30 days after application. A = Callisto, B = Callisto + Atrazine, C = Armezon/Impact, D = Armezon/Impact + Atrazine, E = Laudis, F= Laudis + Atrazine, G = Acuron Flexi, H = Acuron Flexi + Atrazine.